tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663998229877546776.post5770307319715966993..comments2023-06-07T07:26:14.482-04:00Comments on Anti-Choice is Anti-Awesome: Bill C-510 Hits the BlogsThe Pedgehoghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07938339360424729672noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663998229877546776.post-72159668969826642012011-03-19T21:30:29.167-04:002011-03-19T21:30:29.167-04:00Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog a...Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663998229877546776.post-20384451613480697222010-12-14T19:56:29.122-05:002010-12-14T19:56:29.122-05:00How does it give legal status for a fetus? I'v...How does it give legal status for a fetus? I've read the law in the entirety, and it doesn't change the fact that the criminal code still doesn't call a fetus a human being until it is born. You need to do your research on this one, Serena.<br /><br />This law is all about reproductive rights. We don't have reproductive rights at all if we don't have the right to choose to have a baby without the threat of coercion. The men who killed Roxanne were not charged with coercion. They couldn't be. There's no legal precedent, and no law to define it. No one has ever been charged in this type of case. And yet we all know it goes on, especially in certain immigrant communities where boys are valued higher than girls. You really think all those women are happy to have an abortion every time their ultrasound shows it's a girl?? I have a baby girl and I must say this disturbs me greatly.<br /><br />It's one thing to say you're pro-choice. But if you don't support the protection of both choices, you aren't really pro-choice at all.<br /><br />I would suggest you re-read the bill, find out more about Roxanne and then see if you're still against it.Stephanie Ruthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05166285448146925210noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663998229877546776.post-33816867168540423602010-11-12T21:10:53.441-05:002010-11-12T21:10:53.441-05:00I agree - the law needs to be opposed simply becau...I agree - the law needs to be opposed simply because it would give legal status to a fetus. Once that precedent is set, you can say goodbye to women's reproductive rights.Serena Freewomynhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13165366193127789949noreply@blogger.com