tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663998229877546776.post4636742496401016738..comments2023-06-07T07:26:14.482-04:00Comments on Anti-Choice is Anti-Awesome: Slow DayThe Pedgehoghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07938339360424729672noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663998229877546776.post-19772098331715129212007-04-10T11:49:00.000-04:002007-04-10T11:49:00.000-04:00Good question! I just think the term "pro-life" is...Good question! I just think the term "pro-life" is kind of ridiculous, since really, everyone is pro life. I think the main point of the term is to imply that people on the other side are somehow anti-life. <BR/><BR/>I think the issue is about choice - most people wish that abortions didn't have to happen, just some people think the woman should be able to choose, and others think she shouldn't. Hence, pro-choice and anti-choice.<BR/><BR/>I really don't mind the "pro-life" term, I just find "anti-choice" more accurate. As for "anti-life", that's completely ridiculous. No one wants abortions to be legal because they hate babies and want them to die.The Pedgehoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07938339360424729672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7663998229877546776.post-61803716074794045022007-04-10T11:14:00.000-04:002007-04-10T11:14:00.000-04:00I'm curious ... what's your opinion on "anti-choic...I'm curious ... what's your opinion on "anti-choice" vs. "pro-life"?<BR/><BR/>Do you think one is more appropriate than the other, depending on the context, or is "pro-life" ever truly accurate? And what's your thoughts on those who use "anti-life" terminology?<BR/><BR/>I ask because it's always a HUGE debate in what to use in articles (though most journalists I know -- myself include -- tend to use both "pro" terms.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com